Journal article
Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 19, 2016, pp. 565-584
APA
Click to copy
Gehlbach, S., Sonin, K., & Svolik, M. W. (2016). Formal models of nondemocratic politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-014927
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Gehlbach, Scott, Konstantin Sonin, and Milan W. Svolik. “Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 19 (2016): 565–584.
MLA
Click to copy
Gehlbach, Scott, et al. “Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 19, 2016, pp. 565–84, doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-014927.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{gehlbach2016a,
title = {Formal models of nondemocratic politics},
year = {2016},
journal = {Annual Review of Political Science},
pages = {565-584},
volume = {19},
doi = {10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-014927},
author = {Gehlbach, Scott and Sonin, Konstantin and Svolik, Milan W.}
}
The last decade has witnessed growing interest among political scientists and economists in nondemocratic politics. This trend has been reflected in increasingly rigorous game-theoretic modeling of its various aspects: regime persistence and breakdown, ruling-coalition formation and leadership change, protests and repression, formal institutions and elections, and censorship and media control. We review this research agenda, focusing on the foundational assumptions and political intuition behind key models. Our survey reveals a field populated by disparate models of particular mechanisms that nonetheless share two major analytical themes: asymmetries of information and commitment problems. We propose that future models move toward a genuinely comparative study of authoritarian institutions.