Journal article
Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 26, 2023, pp. 175-191
APA
Click to copy
Charnysh, V., Finkel, E., & Gehlbach, S. (2023). Historical political economy: Past, present, and future. Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102440
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Charnysh, Volha, Eugene Finkel, and Scott Gehlbach. “Historical Political Economy: Past, Present, and Future.” Annual Review of Political Science 26 (2023): 175–191.
MLA
Click to copy
Charnysh, Volha, et al. “Historical Political Economy: Past, Present, and Future.” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 26, 2023, pp. 175–91, doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102440.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{charnysh2023a,
title = {Historical political economy: Past, present, and future},
year = {2023},
journal = {Annual Review of Political Science},
pages = {175-191},
volume = {26},
doi = {10.1146/annurev-polisci-051921-102440},
author = {Charnysh, Volha and Finkel, Eugene and Gehlbach, Scott}
}
A recent wave of research in political science examines the past using statistical methods for causal inference and formal theory--a field widely known as historical political economy (HPE). We examine the development of this field. Our survey reveals three common uses of history in HPE: understand- ing the past for its own sake, using history as a way to understand the present, and using history as a setting to explore theoretical conjectures. We present important work in each area and discuss trade-offs of each approach. We further identify key practical and analytical challenges for scholars of HPE, including the accessibility of data that do exist and obstacles to inference when they do not. Looking to the future, we see improved training for scholars entering the field, a heightened focus on the accumulation of knowledge, and greater attention to underexplored topics such as race, gender, ethnicity, and climate change.