The consequences of collective action: An incomplete-contracts approach


Journal article


Scott Gehlbach
American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50(3), 2006, pp. 802-823


View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Gehlbach, S. (2006). The consequences of collective action: An incomplete-contracts approach. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00217.x


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Gehlbach, Scott. “The Consequences of Collective Action: An Incomplete-Contracts Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3 (2006): 802–823.


MLA   Click to copy
Gehlbach, Scott. “The Consequences of Collective Action: An Incomplete-Contracts Approach.” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, no. 3, 2006, pp. 802–23, doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00217.x.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{gehlbach2006a,
  title = {The consequences of collective action: An incomplete-contracts approach},
  year = {2006},
  issue = {3},
  journal = {American Journal of Political Science},
  pages = {802-823},
  volume = {50},
  doi = {10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00217.x},
  author = {Gehlbach, Scott}
}

Abstract

Public policy may be determined as much by what cannot be agreed to by politicians and organized interests as by what can. Focusing on the inability of organized groups to credibly promise that their members will fully report revenues to tax authorities, I develop an incomplete-contracts lobbying model that shows that the provision of collective goods may be influenced by the anticipated tax compliance of economic sectors as well as by the organization of interests. Data from a survey of firms in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union are broadly supportive of the theory: the ability of firms to hide revenues from tax authorities rivals conventional collective-action variables in explaining variation in collective-goods provision, but only in that part of the postcommunist world where differences in revenue hiding across sectors are especially large.